As I clicked through the boxes defining my acceptance of the
contract, I realized that I probably made a mistake moments after clicking okay
to one, in particular. Was I being paranoid? I have tried to read through these
contracts many times, but they usually don’t say anything profoundly relevant
to me. The fact that I void all my legal rights and privacy while they are
completely free of liability for any problems occurring as a result of my
participation was acceptable to me at the time. Why not? Everyone else was
waiving their rights.
But something about the wording and the use of the phrase
“voting profile” seemed unusual and creepy. I should have read the contract
more carefully, but at that point, if I tried to go back, I risked losing all
the information I had already entered. It had taken me at least 15 minutes to
get that far. I convinced myself that it was probably just awkward wording or
my own misreading, and, after only a moment’s pause, I continued the contract
form.
Yet, I am quite certain it was this okay that stripped me of my personal ability to vote, handing more
and more power over to the intelligence of the profile I would develop over the
following year.
Several years earlier, a former music streaming software
company transformed itself into a voter education and facilitation company. Its
phenomenal success was completely unexpected as it transformed an apathetic and
ignorant populace into a politically active, super-charged-voting-body. By
combining cutting-edge game design with the well-known “you might also be
interested in…” marketing techniques, people of all demographics became hooked
on politics.
As players
developed their profiles, topics that matched their interests were presented to
them. Their voting records, of course, were part of their personal profiles.
Concerns about privacy and data hacking were assuaged after five years of no
known security breaches. The encryption technology created by the company was
even more cutting edge than their game design, spinning off into a separate
multi-billion dollar company. The stock holders could not have been happier.
The rest of us, however, were at least as happy to have our
voices heard and to feel our political power was making a difference. We were
completely addicted and it felt good. It felt like we were doing something
important with our lives while being entertained at a level on par with what
people used to describe about reading a good book. We were participating
characters in a continuously unfolding novel, and we were making it!
However, making money and holding a steady job are usually
not the highest concerns of people addicted to a more intense form of reality.
The mundane necessities of paying bills was something we were able to hold at
bay for an unbelievable amount of time through a combination of strategic
voting and personal debt.
That was until the first time I was denied access to my
account: I was dazed and completely unable to comprehend. After regaining consciousness of my financial
and physical reality over the next several days, I vowed never to get sucked
into playing Pandora’s Vox again. But winners never quit, and quitters never
win. Before I knew it, I had paid my
fees and was back at it, voting with passion on bills and laws that seemed
infinitely important to me. Maybe it was the music or the genius of the script
writing software, I do not know, but this was the Meaning of Life for me and
countless others.
After the seventh time of being kicked off the system - for not
paying my subscription fees - I returned to notice something unusual: My voting
trends had continued unabated. It was as if I had never left. I reviewed the
proposals and the measures and was perfectly happy with how I had voted, but I
had never actually voted.
Every day, my profile showed more votes and proposals that I had made while I was sleeping. My
activity was enormous and growing exponentially. I was concurrently participating in local, provincial, national, and
international decisions even while I was reviewing them. However, no matter how
angry I was at this fraud, and how critically I reviewed my record, I could not
have voted as well or written as many excellent proposals as my virtual self
was doing while I was wasting time stewing in my anger and confusion. Despite
myself, I was more than pleased with each vote I reviewed.
Yes, this was the ultimate in representative democracy. Over
the past year, I had created my own personal political representative to tirelessly
work for my deepest and most personal interests at local and international
levels.
After realizing this, I logged off and went for a long walk,
late into the night. I allowed my subscription to run out and did not renew it.
After logging off that day, five years ago, I have not personally voted since. I
know that my political voice is being heard and I am being represented by my
profile much better than I could represent myself. My addiction was not so
pleasing; it turned into a deep depression which did not fade for a full year,
but it did eventually abate.
To this day I do not know how I stand on the ethics of this virtual
representation. I cannot deny that my Pandora’s Vox knows me better than I know
myself; I am convinced of this fact. Perhaps I should ask myself what I truly think.
No comments:
Post a Comment