I have been thinking about the problems with utopianism, the problems with ethics, the problems with economics, the problems with human nature, etc, etc... All rather pessimistic and cynical, but, I can't help believing, realistic. Although this is like saying a realistic definition of a car is four patches of rubber on a road...
In any case, I came across an interview with John Gray, an economist and philosopher who affirms and expands my cynicism to new levels. Here is a taste of his thoughts and style:
“ "I should liken Kant to a man at a ball, who all evening has been carrying on a love affair with a masked beauty in the vain hope of making a conquest, when at last she throws off her mask and reveals herself to be his wife." In Schopenhauer's fable the wife masquerading as an unknown beauty was Christianity. Today it is humanism.
What Schopenhauer wrote of Kant is no less true today. As commonly practiced, philosophy is the attempt to find good reasons for conventional beliefs. In Kant's time the creed of conventional people was Christian, now it is humanist. Nor are these two faiths so different from one another.
Over the past 200 years, philosophy has shaken off Christian faith. It has not given up Christianity's cardinal error – the belief that humans are radically different from all other animals.
Philosophy has been a masked ball in which a religious image of humankind is renewed in the guise of humanist ideas of progress and enlightenment. Even philosophy's greatest unmaskers have ended up as figures in the masquerade. Removing the masks from our animal faces is a task that has hardly begun.
Other animals are born, seek mates, forage for food and die. That is all. But we humans – we think – are different. We are persons, whose actions are the results of their choices. Other animals pass their lives unawares, but we are conscious. Our image of ourselves is formed from our ingrained belief that consciousness, selfhood and free will are what define us as human beings, and raise us above all other creatures.
In our more detached moments, we admit that this view of ourselves is flawed. Our lives are more like fragmentary dreams than the enactments of conscious selves. We control very little of what we most care about; many of our most fateful decisions are made unbeknownst to ourselves. Yet we insist that mankind can achieve what we cannot: conscious mastery of its existence. This is the creed of those who have given up an irrational belief in God for an irrational faith in mankind.
But what if we give up the empty hopes of Christianity and humanism? Once we switch off the soundtrack – the babble of God and immortality, progress and humanity – what sense can we make of our lives?
”
— John Gray, Straw Dogs
1 comment:
I think the concept of mortality is the ultimate definition between man and animal though. Creatures are conscious of danger, and the consequences of succumbing to said danger, but humans see it in an entirely different light. Even the concept of time revolves around our relationship with mortality. Where a beast changes his life based on his environment, seasons, weather, humans have removed ourselves from those chains and our lives are for the most part, very much undeterred by the world around us. That basically leaves us with nothing left to be driven by save for other humans. Thus the importance and strength of things like religion and basic humanism.
Hope that makes sense. Good blog! glad I stumbled upon it.
Post a Comment